The story has it that the first of the Pythagoreans to publicize
irrational numbers perished in a shipwreck. The scholium on Euclid's

*Book X*
in which this story appears admits that the tale may have been an
allegory, "hinting that everything irrational and formless is properly
concealed, and, if any soul should rashly invade this region of life and
lay it open, it would be carried away into the seas of becoming and be
overwhelmed by its unresting currents." I am sure that I am not the
first student of Euclid to feel that this is true, to reach Proposition 9
of Book X and try literally and figuratively to close the book and
pretend that nothing has happened. Maybe I'll print the Bible or pass
handgun legislation in the USA. Something easy like that.

The
study of irrational numbers is thought to have begun with the
application of the Pythagorean theorem to the diagonal of a square whose
side is 1, resulting in a diagonal whose length is √2. By following the
implications of this result to their logical conclusions, the side of
the square is shown to be both odd

*and* even, a proposition which would lead, if not to shipwreck, then surely to migraine in any rational Pythagorean. The discovery of irrationals, or what Euclid calls

*incommensurables*, lead to a re-casting of geometric thought, which in turn produced Euclid's gargantuan

*Book X*. The book contains 116 of the 450 Euclidean propositions and is veiled in a similar opacity as I described in my post on

*Book V*.

The
Euclidean Books of Lines, as I call them,—Books, V, VII, VIII, IX, and
the beginning of X—use straight lines to represent number and magnitude.
It is a simple enough system from which our contemporary use of x, y,
etc. was developed, designed to steer clear of assigning any specific
values to the formulas. For those of us who love the simple things in
life, circles, triangles, rhombi, etc., the system of lines can feel
more like an army of tiny little sabres slowly bleeding one to death. Take, for instance, Proposition x.10:

*To
find two straight lines incommensurable, the one in length only, and
the other in square also, with an assigned straight line.* The
traditional diagram for this proposition is pictured below, five
straight lines of ambiguous length, standing in for the measures and
magnitudes. I get intellectual brain freeze when I stare at these
diagrams. I understand them, even crave them, but they make me hurt for
the pleasure. Below the traditional diagram is an image of my sketched
proof which I think is an accurate portrait of how my mind deals with
these problems. I assign value and build the square, both of which go
against the Euclidean grain.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On other fronts, Travis Becker from Twinrocker Handmade Paper sent me a sample making of paper for the deluxe edition of

*Interstices & Intersections*.
He was trying to make a paper using cotton rag and abaca fibers that
would approximate a linen and cotton paper I made with Mina Takahashi
last year. The results were beautiful. Yesterday I proofed a variety of
plates to test line quality and paper stretch and the sheets performed
perfectly. In a few weeks Travis will begin work on the 800 sheets
required for the deluxe copies.

The traditional diagram for Proposition x.10, using straight lines to represent number and magnitude.

My parsing of the proof using assigned values and forms.